Post by Interest on Sept 12, 2005 22:46:27 GMT
the champs were Roger F (as usual)
and
Kim clisters (not sure about spelling) winning her first grand slam ever.
The agasi and federer game was brilliant, andrei played some of the best tennis of his carrer but it was not enough to beat the no 1 seed and legend roger federer, in some ways i think this grand slam was abit of a dissapointment, alot of great players went out at the beggining or weren't in it (ie marat safin andy rodick)
I dont think this one compared with the australian, maybe wimbeldon? but not the australian open
Your thoughts guys?
and
Kim clisters (not sure about spelling) winning her first grand slam ever.
The agasi and federer game was brilliant, andrei played some of the best tennis of his carrer but it was not enough to beat the no 1 seed and legend roger federer, in some ways i think this grand slam was abit of a dissapointment, alot of great players went out at the beggining or weren't in it (ie marat safin andy rodick)
I dont think this one compared with the australian, maybe wimbeldon? but not the australian open
Your thoughts guys?
